Royal Feud Expected to Run Until William Dies of Heart Attack and Stress, Tabloids Fear Harry May Eventually Run Out of Things to Apologise For
Fleet Street Orders Champagne, Hires Retired Hostage Negotiator and Books the Fortieth Diana Anniversary Early
LONDON — Prince William has said no again. According to a Yahoo Entertainment report, he has reportedly turned down another chance to make up with Prince Harry before the thirtieth anniversary of Princess Diana's death, so the brothers are every bit as estranged as they were last week. Courtiers are concerned. Courtiers are always concerned, it's most of the job. The tabloid trade, meanwhile, has reportedly ordered enough champagne to float a medium-sized aircraft carrier, though nobody can say why you'd want to.
The whole business has become Britain's most reliable renewable resource. Wind turbines stop when the wind drops, and solar panels sulk from October to March, but two princes in separate houses, each declining to ring the other, will keep Fleet Street in headlines until the sun burns out. Royal experts now expect another fifty years of brotherly resentment, record newspaper revenues, ever more elderly palace sources and what could be the first funeral in history interrupted by an argument that started in 2020.
Why the Prince William and Harry Feud Is Britain's Last Growth Industry
We've lost the coal mines. Most of the factories went too, along with a decent slice of national optimism. What we still lead the world at is paying people to explain why two brothers aren't speaking. The feud keeps journalists in work, and photographers, and royal commentators, and palace insiders, and body-language experts, and psychologists who have never met either prince, and at least fourteen elderly women who once saw Diana buying groceries. Each time William lets Harry's call ring out, three more reporters get a mortgage approved. The Treasury is said to be wondering whether the brothers' resentment could be classed as a strategic national asset.
Which is why a reconciliation would be a catastrophe. Picture it. Tomorrow morning William and Harry shake hands. What do the papers print?
Nobody knows.
Hundreds of commentators would have to retrain as people who actually know something. The Daily Mail would be left with house prices, the Express would crawl back to predicting weather emergencies, and the Sunday supplements might have to interview human beings who have jobs. The Chancellor would be forced into an emergency Royal Hostility Preservation Grant. Nobody wants two brothers to stay angry forever, apart from the people whose mortgages depend on it.
William's Silence Is Worth More Than Harry's Entire Publishing Contract
Harry talks. William doesn't. Harry does the interview, William declines the interview, and then William is reportedly livid that Harry did the interview. Both ends of this deal pay out for the newspapers. Harry hands over the words, William hands over the facial expressions, and the tabloids bank the difference.
Silence is the real money, though, because you can fill it with whatever you fancy. "William declines to comment" turns into William seething, or William humiliated, or William secretly devastated, or William plotting revenge, sometimes all four before lunch. It takes six columns to report a man saying nothing. Nobody has ever explained to me how that works.
Royal Experts Keep Predicting a Reconciliation That Never Comes
Royal commentary is a very odd profession. Say it'll be sunny every day for twenty-five years and the weather desk sacks you. Say the brothers will reconcile this Christmas, every Christmas, for twenty-five years, and they give you a promotion and a podcast.
In 2045 one of these experts will announce that the brothers have never been closer to healing their wounds. Pressed for evidence, he'll say both men have recently been seen breathing. A colleague will pick up a thaw because Harry visited Britain at a time when William was also, technically, somewhere in Britain. By 2050 the panel is debating the odds of a breakthrough at Christmas 2051. At this point it isn't journalism, it's an Advent calendar with no chocolate in it.
Kate, Diana's Anniversary and the Royal Anger-Management Department
Every royal headline needs someone to calm William down, and the someone is nearly always Catherine. One week William is furious and she soothes him. The next he's raging and she urges restraint. Then he goes incandescent, and she maintains a dignified silence, and round we go again. By 2035 she'll have put in so many hours that she qualifies for an honorary doctorate in industrial refrigeration. The palace will probably end up employing three full-time counsellors, an emergency tea trolley and a retired hostage negotiator whose real job is keeping William's blood pressure out of the papers. He will fail. Every so often Kate points out that Harry hasn't actually been in the room for years, which makes William angrier still.
Diana herself has turned into the most valuable newspaper franchise since the royal wedding. The thirtieth anniversary of her death, in 2027, ought to be a quiet day of remembrance. The tabloids have found that remembrance sells far better with a furious disagreement stood next to it. William wants privacy. Harry wants to talk in public about his mother's legacy. The papers would like those two positions to drift further apart every week, and a family photograph from 1992 can now run beside a row that broke out thirty-five years later. Somebody in Fleet Street has surely booked the fortieth anniversary already.
Palace Sources Now Outnumber the Royal Family
Nobody knows who they are, and every story has one. A source close to William. A source familiar with Harry's thinking. A palace insider, a royal observer, a friend of the family. Before long Britain will have twelve working royals and forty thousand people close enough to them to give confidential interviews.
Watch how it works. One paper reports William was furious at 10.30. Another has Harry devastated at 10.45, though neither man has said a public word. By eleven a third paper has a detailed account of how Catherine took the news of a conversation that never took place, and by lunchtime the palace has denied everything, which gives tomorrow's front pages their material. Then a television presenter reads the newspaper, a royal expert interprets the presenter, an American magazine interviews the expert, and a British paper reports that Americans are worried about the feud. The original row was between two men who don't speak. The row about the row involves several million people who can't stop. Economists call this value creation, and family therapists call it the reason nobody wants to host Christmas.
Harry's Apology Programme Will Still Be Under Review in 2060
Imagine Harry setting up a standing apology scheme. Every morning at nine a handwritten letter lands at Kensington Palace. "Dear William, I'm terribly sorry." Chocolates on Tuesdays, flowers on Thursdays, and on Fridays an offer to talk it all over at lunch. William reportedly refuses the lot. By 2060 the Royal Mail has launched a subscription called Apologies to William and Harry's tally is past eleven thousand.
A newspaper reports that William is weighing whether the latest apology is sincere enough. A palace source says he'd first like Harry to apologise for having apologised publicly for something he'd already apologised for in private. A royal expert calls this significant progress.
How William Dies of a Heart Attack and Stress in 2079 With the Feud Unresolved
Skip forward to 2079. King William V is 97 and has spent most of those years getting angrier with his little brother. Harry is 95 and has spent most of his retirement saying he'd love to sort it all out. Then one morning William has a fatal heart attack, the last result of a lifetime of stress, and a family argument that has outlived several European governments comes to a stop.
Harry goes up to the coffin. "William, I really think we ought to talk." A palace official explains, very gently, that His Majesty isn't taking calls. "That's what he's been saying since 2020," says Harry. By breakfast the papers have their exclusive, WILLIAM REFUSES HARRY'S FINAL ATTEMPT AT RECONCILIATION: PALACE SILENCE DEEPENS, and a royal expert is on the radio explaining that the King's failure to answer speaks volumes. Funeral coverage triples newspaper revenues.
The editors have a genuine dilemma, to be fair to them. Do they lead on the death of a monarch or on Harry's reaction to it? They do both, with Harry in bigger type. The coroner records heart attack as the cause of death, with stress as a contributing factor, so the papers print "stress" in ninety-six-point capitals and tuck "heart attack" into a footnote. ROYAL FEUD CLAIMS FINAL VICTIM: DECADES OF BROTHERLY RESENTMENT FINALLY BROKE WILLIAM'S HEART.
A cardiologist politely mentions that, according to the NHS guidance on heart attacks, the usual causes are blood clots, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and smoking, and that the American Heart Association says long-term stress can push blood pressure up and add to the risk. So even the doctors agree that sixty years of leaving your brother's calls unanswered does you no good. A body-language expert remembers William folding his arms at a garden party in 2034 and calls it the first warning sign. A royal commentator adds that medicine has never understood the particular pressures of being photographed at Wimbledon. Harry puts out a statement of sorrow, and the tabloids ask at once whether the wording was an insult.
The Tabloids Carry On After William's Death Without Either Brother's Permission
A man dying of a heart attack and stress doesn't end the argument, because far too many people are paid to interpret it. After the funeral the papers report that Harry was excluded from some events, that his turning up at others caused controversy, and that staying away from the rest was equally controversial. One expert says William would have been furious. Another says he'd secretly have welcomed a reconciliation. Both theories run on facing pages.
Eventually some historian finds a letter from William to Harry containing the words "Please stop." The headline reads WILLIAM'S FINAL WORDS TO HARRY REVEALED: EXPERTS DIVIDED OVER WHETHER PRINCE WAS BEGGING FOR PEACE. By then George and Archie may have fallen out over something their fathers said, and Fleet Street can see a lovely chance to renew the franchise. The monarchy is hereditary. Apparently the newspaper coverage is as well.
The Real Winner of the Royal Feud: Britain's Tabloid Press
Underneath the jokes there's a plain business point. A long estrangement has built an entire industry that does better out of hostility than forgiveness. Reconciliation might make two brothers happier, sure. It wouldn't get anyone to click on Tuesday. The papers have worked out that the fewer words William and Harry swap, the more words everybody else gets paid to write.
Britain once built an empire on trade. A fair-sized chunk of the celebrity press has now built one on two men refusing to share a pot of tea. And if William and Harry ever do make peace, there's one headline that will sell by the million: PALACE RECONCILIATION SPARKS NEW FEUD OVER WHICH BROTHER APOLOGISED FIRST.
Satirical Disclaimer
This article is political and royal-family satire. The future fatal heart attack, the stress as a cause of death, the funeral coverage, the invented quotes and the economic consequences are all comic exaggeration. None of it is a claim about Prince William's health, medical prognosis or future, and nothing here suggests that the feud, stress or anything else will harm him. Reports of the brothers' estrangement should be kept apart from unverified claims about their private conversations.
This story is entirely a human collaboration between two sentient beings: the world's oldest tenured professor and a philosophy major turned dairy farmer, both of whom believe that the British tabloid industry would regard a lasting royal reconciliation as a national financial emergency.
SOURCE: Yahoo Entertainment report. https://prat.uk/royal-feud-expected-to-run-until-william-dies/
Comments
Post a Comment