James Talarico's Missing Nine Days
Megyn Kelly Investigates James Talarico's Missing Nine Days, Discovers Democrats Can Disappear Without Anyone in Texas Noticing a Difference


Texas Democrat returns after nine days with the flu, prompting questions about whether his political career might benefit from another nine days of bed rest. Meanwhile, state officials struggle to identify a single essential service that stopped functioning during his absence.


AUSTIN, TEXAS — Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico is back on the campaign trail after nine days away, ending a political crisis that left Texans asking one question: was he gone?

The absence drew the attention of Megyn Kelly, a long line of conservative commentators, several political operatives and The Daily Beast, whose coverage of the Talarico controversy is linked here. His return, unfortunately for him, raised a worse question than the one it answered. What exactly did Texas lose during those nine days?

The lights stayed on across the ERCOT grid. The cattle kept grazing. The wells kept pumping under the eye of the Texas Railroad Commission, and Buc-ee's held to its famously strict restroom standards. Millions of Texans went to work without checking in with a single Democratic Senate candidate. The state ran so normally that political scientists have started asking whether a shortage of politicians counts as an overlooked form of economic stimulus.


Texas Democrats Celebrate Talarico's Return, Having Apparently Forgotten to Miss Him


Talarico's campaign said he had been home recovering from the flu. He last appeared at a virtual event on September 30 and came back October 9 with an unannounced walk through the Austin City Limits music festival at Zilker Park, according to The Texas Tribune's reporting on James Talarico's nine-day absence.

Democrats were relieved, campaign staff most of all, since they had spent the better part of two weeks wondering whether they were still supposed to raise money for a candidate nobody could find. Ordinary Texans needed a little more explanation. Here was a closely watched Senate race in the nation's second-largest state, and the state had carried on without a single daily instruction from the candidate. Democrats spend a good deal of breath warning voters about the catastrophic consequences of Republican policy, and they had now demonstrated, by accident, that the absence of a Democratic politician causes no detectable interruption in daily life.

Dale Hutchins, 61, a cattle rancher outside Lampasas, offered the kind of analysis Washington consultants charge several million dollars for. "Did the cattle quit eating? No. Did the bank quit collecting? No. Then what the hell was that fellow supposed to be doing?" Hutchins said. The question has not been answered.


Talarico's Flu Delivers Nine Days of Campaign Silence Texas Republicans Never Managed


Talarico blamed influenza, which the CDC describes as a contagious respiratory illness and which has been circulating among Americans for centuries without ever being recognized as a tool of political reform. Fever, cough, exhaustion and muscle aches are the usual symptoms. In Talarico's case it also knocked out stump speeches, campaign appearances, fundraising appeals and the steady supply of unsolicited advice about what ordinary Texans should believe.

Doctors recommend rest and fluids. Texas conservatives, watching the dip in Democratic campaign activity, found a side benefit, and the benefit was quiet. That is the strange thing about politicians who catch the flu: they immediately do what taxpayers have begged them to do for years. They stay home, they stop talking, they skip the meetings, and nobody receives a new government program explaining why the problems from the last program require another program. The illness deserves sympathy. The sudden drop in exposure to campaign speeches deserves further study.


Texas Legislature Reports No Drop in Productivity During Talarico's Absence


The Texas Legislature, which meets in regular session in odd-numbered years, was not sitting in October, and that made the absence hard to measure. Political observers fell back on a new productivity indicator: the number of things that keep working when an elected official isn't around.

By that standard, the nine days looked very good. No highway collapsed for lack of an infrastructure speech. No Texan forgot how to run a barbecue pit. No refinery asked a Democratic Senate candidate for emergency guidance, and not one pickup truck had to be rescued from ideological uncertainty.

The implications for government efficiency are large. For decades politicians have measured themselves by bills introduced, speeches given, hearings attended and dollars spent. Texas may have found a simpler system: send them home for nine days and measure the damage. If there isn't any, extend the experiment. At thirty days, think about canceling their parking privileges. At sixty, find out whether the state could run on a governor, a calculator and a guy who knows how to fix the air conditioning.


Megyn Kelly and the Ohio Hospital Theory: Where Was James Talarico?


Conservative broadcaster Megyn Kelly took up the question of where Talarico had been, and online speculation soon grew into claims that he had been treated at the Lindner Center of Hope, a mental health facility in Ohio. The theory rested on flight-tracking posts and an audio recording circulated by conservative influencers. The facility then said publicly that Talarico had never been a patient, and Talarico said he had never even been to Ohio. PolitiFact's fact check of the Ohio hospital claim reached the same conclusion, and his campaign said he spent the week at home in Austin.

That settled the question of geography a good deal better than it settled the political one. Americans now know where Talarico was. They still lack a satisfying explanation for how a candidate can do nothing publicly for nine days and return to a job where he is expected to be thanked for his service.

The line between illness and politics gets harder to explain. Illness leaves people weak, tired and unable to work. Politics produces the same symptoms in everyone forced to listen. Influenza runs its course and disappears, while a political speech can outlast three elections, two recounts and a campaign finance investigation. At least a virus knows when it has overstayed its welcome.


Talarico Campaign Fundraising Emails Resume After Nine Quiet Days


When Talarico returned, campaign operations picked up again with the familiar enthusiasm of people whose livelihoods depend on convincing strangers that the republic cannot survive without one more donation. For nine days, potential donors had a rare stretch in which they could open their email without being told that democracy would perish unless they handed over $17 before midnight.

As a fundraising experiment it was remarkable. The candidate stopped appearing in public, the campaign kept existing, and the world did not end. Those findings are unlikely to make it into future Democratic strategy, since consultants tend to oppose any reform that might show how little campaigning the public needs. In Washington, a winning campaign takes television ads, pollsters, social media directors, professional fundraisers and a small army whose job is to explain why the candidate urgently needs more consultants. In Texas, a successful ordinary Tuesday takes gas, working traffic lights and somebody remembering to unlock the feed store.

Marlene Ochoa, who runs a feed store in Giddings, said she unlocked hers at 7:30 every morning of the nine days and that nobody from either campaign called to check. The two economies run independently of each other.


Back at Work: Why a Candidate's Return Is News and a Plumber's Isn't


Talarico's reappearance at Austin City Limits showed another odd feature of American politics. Most people returning from an extended absence face hundreds of emails, a pile of unfinished projects and the chance that someone has figured out how to do their job without them. Politicians come back to press coverage. A plumber who disappears for nine days comes back to nine days of plumbing, a mechanic to nine days of busted transmissions, a farmer to chores the livestock refused to postpone. A candidate comes back to a news cycle about the fact that he came back.

That may be the best employment perk in the modern economy. Picture a construction worker announcing that he has recovered from the flu and is ready to resume standing beside a building other people are putting up. No cameras would come. Nobody would order a national poll. The foreman would ask whether he had brought his tools. In politics, simply returning to work can be treated as a development in American democracy.


Ken Paxton's Missing-Person Posters and the Tala-Freak-Out Tip Line


Republican opponent Ken Paxton's campaign made the absence its main talking point. It demanded proof of life, asked for a photo of Talarico holding a current newspaper, handed out mock missing-person posters and opened what it called the "Tala-Freak-Out Tip Line" for sightings, as Texas Scorecard reported on the tip line launch. Newsweek's report on the missing posters added a milk-carton-style graphic that kept a running count of the days. At a San Antonio rally, Paxton led the crowd in a chant asking where Talarico was, and, according to CNN's coverage of Talarico's return, President Donald Trump described the candidate as missing in action in a Truth Social post.

Politics had arrived at a place where a candidate's best achievement may be getting his opponent to pay for advertising his absence. A missing-person poster traditionally asks the public to help find someone. The political version raises a harder question: would finding him improve things? There is a basic difference between looking for a missing dog and looking for a missing politician. When the dog comes home, everyone is delighted. When the politician comes home, the fundraising emails start again. The dog also has the advantage of not introducing legislation.


Nine Days Without Campaign Speeches: What Texas Voters Noticed


Political speeches are among the few forms of communication in which a person can talk for 45 minutes without answering a question anyone asked. Talarico's return means Texans can again enjoy the full democratic experience of hearing politicians explain their solutions to problems that may have been easier to solve before politicians got involved.

Every modern campaign promises change, which makes the most notable feature of the nine-day absence how little changed. Texans kept paying taxes. Businesses kept hiring. Families kept arguing over the grocery bill. The Dallas Cowboys kept supplying emotional hardship without any help from state government, and the weather stayed indifferent to party affiliation. A Democrat went missing and Texas went on operating. There may be a lesson in that about the difference between a functioning society and the political class that takes credit for it.


Talarico vs. Paxton: Can a Senate Candidate Prove He Is Indispensable?


Talarico is now back on the trail against Paxton for a U.S. Senate seat, with early voting in Texas running October 19 through 30 and Election Day on November 3. CNN has him at a town hall in Fort Worth this evening, moderated by Erin Burnett. He has also accepted four debate invitations, while Paxton, the Texas Tribune reports, has accepted none. Texas therefore has a Senate race in which one candidate went missing for nine days and the other is still missing from the debate stage.

Talarico also faces a problem political science has not studied enough. How does a politician persuade people that his presence is indispensable after showing them they can get along fine without hearing from him for nine days straight? Strategists would say the absence was unavoidable, that illness is a normal part of life and that recovering before going back to work is sensible. All reasonable. Reasonableness has never been a profitable campaign strategy. Modern candidates must show urgency. Everything is a crisis, every election is the most important in history, every opponent is an unprecedented danger to civilization, and every fundraising deadline is absolutely final until tomorrow's absolutely final deadline.

Against that backdrop, nine days of quiet looks almost radical: no speeches, no slogans, no existential warnings, just a man at home recovering while millions of people lived their lives. Now he wants to go to Washington, where politicians have spent generations perfecting the art of accomplishing very little while explaining how busy they are. His qualifications for that institution may be stronger than anyone realized.


The Texas Political Productivity Test: A Proposal for Senate Races


The lesson is not that politicians should work while sick. Nobody needs a feverish candidate coughing through a town hall to prove commitment. The lesson is what happens when politics stops demanding everyone's attention for a while. For nine days, Texans got a look at an unusual arrangement: a candidate who was not available for appearances, a government that kept running and a population fully able to make its own decisions.

That suggests a reform. Before accepting a candidate's claim that his leadership is essential, voters should ask for a practical demonstration. Have him stay home for nine days. If the roads stay open, the economy keeps running and the grocery stores still have toilet paper, extend the trial another nine. If conditions improve, consider extending the program to Congress.

There would be objections. Politicians would insist their work is essential. Consultants would warn of severe consequences for the political advertising industry. Cable executives would panic at the prospect of reporting actual news. Ordinary Texans, meanwhile, might discover a benefit: more time to do what politicians constantly claim to be helping them do, which is make a living.

If James Talarico wants to show he understands working families, his next campaign promise could be the simplest in American political history: "Vote for me, and I promise to leave you alone." Unfortunately, after nine days away, he's back, and Texas has lost its brief chance to find out whether ten days might have been even better.


Five Humorous Observations About the Talarico Disappearance

- Nine days. The man had the flu for nine days. I've had the flu and I was missing for nine days too, and nobody printed a poster. My own mother didn't call. And I'm lying there thinking, maybe I'm just not as important as a Senate candidate. No. I don't have a tip line.


- They set up a tip line for a guy with a fever. Who's calling that in? "Yeah, hi, I'd like to report a sighting. He's in his house. On a couch. He looks terrible." That's not a tip. That's every Tuesday in America.


- You know how I figured out a politician was missing? The emails stopped. Nine days, nobody asked me for seventeen dollars. I thought my phone was broken. I restarted it twice. I almost called my carrier.


- Everybody agrees you should stay home when you're sick. Everybody. Except the guy at your office who comes in coughing on the stapler and says he's "pushing through." Talarico stayed home and got a manhunt. The stapler guy gets Employee of the Month.


- Somebody decided he was in a hospital in Ohio. Ohio. If you're gonna run from the Texas press, you go to Cabo. Nobody has ever fled to Ohio. Ohio is where you end up when your GPS gives up on you.

Disclaimer


This article is political satire. Its public reactions, hypothetical interviews and proposed productivity tests are humorous commentary, not factual survey results or official findings. Talarico's reported illness and subsequent public return are documented. Claims that he secretly received treatment at an Ohio psychiatric facility were denied by the facility and by Talarico and are not supported by available reporting.

Editorial mythology credits this production to an entirely human collaboration between two sentient beings: the world's oldest tenured professor and a philosophy major turned dairy farmer. Neither has requested nine days of medical leave, although both are reportedly considering it after reviewing Congress.

SOURCE: https://www.thedailybeast.com/megyn-kelly-doubles-down-on-crackpot-claims-about-texas-dem-star-james-talarico https://bohiney.com/james-talaricos-missing-nine-days/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sam Altman’s Harem of Pirated Girlfriends

Henry VIII and Fatherhood

CeltExit Creates Four Food Standards Agencies