Corporation ends a beloved consumer show while inventing exciting new ways to tell licence-fee payers to stop expecting what they paid for
LONDON, ENGLAND - The BBC has announced plans to axe Radio 4's long-running consumer programme You and Yours, apparently deciding that 56 years of helping ordinary people survive British bureaucracy was quite enough.
The programme is among several facing the chop as the corporation chases substantial savings and redirects money towards new formats for digital audiences and podcasts, The Guardian reports. The BBC also plans to develop a refreshed consumer programme, which is a bit like selling you a new umbrella after confiscating the old one in the rain.
It raises a fascinating philosophical question. What happens when an organisation funded by the public decides the public's favourite programmes are getting in the way of serving the public?
The answer, naturally, involves a restructuring committee.
The BBC Identifies the Problem With Consumer Broadcasting
For decades, You and Yours investigated the grievances of ordinary consumers, from misleading adverts and faulty kettles to dodgy financial products. Its guiding principle was gloriously simple: if somebody sells you something, you should get what you paid for.
That principle has apparently become awkward inside an organisation that collects a compulsory television licence fee from everyone who needs one.
Picture a consumer programme investigating a company that keeps charging customers while discontinuing the products they enjoy. Now picture that programme working for the company.
You begin to see the philosophical difficulties facing Broadcasting House. Somebody should do a segment on it. Sadly, the slot has been cut.
Modernisation Means Replacing Something That Works
BBC executives speak warmly about reaching audiences across changing platforms. Fair enough. People consume media differently now, and public broadcasters have to adapt.
The comedy starts when adapting becomes indistinguishable from removing.
A programme listeners enjoy is cancelled because its format is deemed insufficiently modern. It's then replaced with a programme designed to appeal to the very audience that enjoyed the one that was cancelled. Management calls the resulting upheaval innovation.
The procedure resembles closing a successful pub because people like drinking there, then reopening it as a digital hospitality concept where the beer is discussed on a podcast. Customers are told their drinking experience has been transformed.
The pint is unavailable.
Somewhere in Broadcasting House the replacement programme is presumably still at the "audience discovery" stage, which involves a strategy deck, a mood board and a working title that tested well with nobody in particular. Early drafts will no doubt include a jingle, a second jingle in case the first one underperforms and a segment in which a presenter reads out a refund policy while sounding genuinely sorry about it.
The old programme did all this with a phone, a producer and a presenter who sounded like a disappointed bank manager. That model, regrettably, has no slide deck.
British Thinking Becomes a Budget Line
Other Radio 4 programmes facing cuts include Thinking Allowed and Free Thinking.
For an institution supposedly devoted to public enlightenment, scrapping two shows with "thinking" in the title shows impressive administrative consistency. Thinking Allowed implies a degree of intellectual freedom. Free Thinking implies thinking without payment. Neither fits comfortably with modern management accounting, where every thought needs a cost centre.
There's also Open Country, which at least sounds economically promising, since the countryside generally exists without a presenter having to create it. Naturally, going out to find it and explaining why it matters still costs money, and a man in a waterproof jacket doesn't come cheap.
You and Yours Fans Pen Strongly Worded Letters
Britain's Radio 4 audience is not a crowd given to rioting. Its idea of direct action is a sternly worded email beginning "Dear Sir or Madam" and ending with the phrase "I remain, yours faithfully, thoroughly disappointed". Expect a flood.
Somewhere in Cheltenham a retired schoolteacher is already sharpening a pencil. In Harrogate, a man with a cardigan and strong opinions about the licence fee has reportedly cleared his diary. The BBC's complaints unit, in turn, is believed to be drafting a reply that thanks them for their passion and promises to share it with the relevant team.
The relevant team is, of course, also being restructured.
A Nation of Radio 4 Listeners Prepares Its Complaints
The BBC's defenders reasonably argue that restructuring is unavoidable when audiences shift and budgets tighten. They have a point. Public service broadcasting under the corporation's Royal Charter isn't supposed to be frozen in 1970, however much a certain kind of listener would like it to be.
The problem isn't that broadcasters should never change. It's that managers keep talking about audience engagement while seeming astonished that audiences have opinions.
The average Radio 4 listener isn't demanding fireworks, influencers or an immersive digital ecosystem. Plenty of them just want someone intelligent to explain why their electricity company has charged them twice.
Britain already has enough podcasts featuring people discussing ideas in rooms. What it occasionally needs is somebody willing to phone an insurance company and ask where the refund went. Preferably on hold, for forty minutes, with the music on.
The Corporation Promises a Better Tomorrow
The BBC insists it's planning future services and holding firm on its commitment to public-value journalism. That commitment will ultimately be judged by what audiences actually hear.
In the meantime, listeners can take comfort that their complaints about cancelled consumer programming may eventually be investigated by a replacement consumer programme.
If the new programme fails to look into those complaints, listeners can always contact the BBC directly. An automated message will confirm that their feedback is valued.
Unfortunately, the feedback department is currently being restructured.
Source: The Guardian. This is satirical news based on real reporting. The cuts are real. The Cheltenham pencil-sharpener, the man in the cardigan and the restructured feedback department are comic inventions, and no BBC executive was quoted, restructured or harmed in the writing of this piece. Radio 4 listeners in need of a replacement can browse other news satire sites. https://prat.uk/?p=51516
Comments
Post a Comment