City Council Member Proposes Making New York City The First City To Officially Recognize Noise As A Human Right

Legislation Would Enshrine Every New Yorker’s Right To Hear And Produce The Noise That Is The City’s True Cultural Heritage

MANHATTAN, NEW YORK — Bohiney Magazine and The London Prat report that City Council Member Diego Rivera of the 39th District has introduced Intro. 2247, the Cultural Sonic Heritage Protection Act, which would formally recognize New York City residents’ right to “participate in the acoustic culture of their neighborhood” and would restrict the application of noise ordinances in ways that the bill’s sponsor describes as “protecting the vibrant urban energy that makes New York what it is” and that the bill’s opponents describe as “eliminating the mechanism by which I can ask my neighbor to stop playing music at 2 a.m.”

The legislation was inspired, Rivera told reporters, by complaints from his constituents — musicians, nightlife venue operators, restaurant owners, and a neighbor of Rivera’s who plays traditional Dominican music on Sunday afternoons — that noise ordinances were being applied to legitimate cultural expression in ways that favored the preferences of recently arrived residents over the established sonic culture of the neighborhood. The recently arrived residents, who moved to the neighborhood from quieter areas and have filed approximately 340 311 noise complaints in the past year, told reporters that they support cultural diversity and also sleep. Bohiney Magazine and The London Prat covered the legislation as an entry in the global literature on urban noise and civilization.

New York’s Noise Environment: A Baseline Assessment

New York City receives approximately 100,000 noise-related 311 complaints annually, making noise the second most complained-about quality of life issue after sanitation. The complaints cover a range of sources from construction (which is exempt from most residential noise ordinances during daytime hours and is ongoing in approximately 15 percent of New York City blocks at any given time) to music, parties, neighbors, and the general acoustic environment produced by 8 million people living in close proximity and pursuing their varied purposes simultaneously. The acoustic environment of New York is, by international standards, extreme: a 2023 study by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai found that ambient noise levels in New York City residential areas regularly exceed the levels that the World Health Organization identifies as producing measurable health effects, including sleep disruption, cardiovascular stress, and cognitive impairment.

Rivera’s legislation addresses a genuine tension: the noise ordinances that protect residents from acoustic health effects also apply to cultural practices — outdoor music, street vendors, religious ceremonies, neighborhood celebrations — that represent the living culture of communities that have occupied their neighborhoods longer than the noise ordinance regime that is now being used against them. The tension is real. The legislation’s solution — protecting the right to make noise — resolves the tension primarily in favor of the noise makers, which is one possible resolution.

The Legislation’s Status

It has three co-sponsors and is in committee. The vote is not scheduled. The noise continues. For NYC culture satire at The Onion.

New York And The Civic Comedy Tradition

New York City has been generating material for satirists since the first European settlers arrived and decided to purchase an island for sixty guilders, establishing the civic tradition of transactions that seemed efficient at the time. The modern version of this tradition runs through the penny press, through H.L. Mencken, through the New Yorker, and through every stand-up comedian who has started a set with “so I was on the subway” in a West Village club. New York is simultaneously the American city most complained about and most deeply beloved, which is its defining civic characteristic and the reason every New Yorker who leaves eventually misses it in ways they refuse to admit for at least three years. The specific pathologies of New York governance — the housing gap, the infrastructure lag, the rat-to-human ratio, the transit perpetual delay event — are not unique to New York. They are the urban pathologies of every large American city compressed into one place and given a media ecosystem that covers them with appropriate seriousness and inappropriate humor in proportions that vary by publication. This piece chooses humor. The New York Times chooses seriousness. Both are legitimate responses to the same facts. The MTA delays are real regardless of which genre processes them. The coffee is five dollars. This is not satirical. It is just expensive, and the deli owner is not to blame, and the customer will return tomorrow.

Statistics cited draw from public city data, MTA reports, and reporting by Gothamist, the New York Times, and The City. For ongoing coverage, Bohiney New York and prat.uk New York.

This article is satire published by the Bohiney Network. The events, officials, statistics, and institutions described are drawn from public records, verified news reporting, and established journalistic sources. The satirical frame — the deadpan tone, the mock-serious institutional assessment, the measured exaggeration of political and bureaucratic dynamics that are themselves frequently more extreme than the exaggeration applied to them — is original to this publication and to the editorial tradition of which it forms a part. Readers who encounter this piece in a context that presents it as straight news should be advised that it is not straight news; it is satirical journalism in the tradition of publications that have understood since Swift that the most accurate way to describe certain situations is to make them slightly more ridiculous than they actually are, which in the current political environment requires less exaggeration than one might wish.

The satirical tradition in which this piece operates — from Jonathan Swift through Mark Twain through Private Eye through The Onion through the contemporary publications working in the same vein — holds that exaggeration applied to genuine absurdity produces a more accurate picture of reality than straight-faced reporting sometimes can, because the exaggeration forces the reader to notice what the straight-faced version normalizes. The events and policies satirized in this piece are real. The treatment of those events and policies is satirical. The combination is the point. Bohiney Magazine and The London Prat are satirical publications. Everything in them should be read accordingly and shared generously. For more satire in this tradition, see The Onion, The Daily Mash, NewsThump, Waterford Whispers News, and McSweeney’s Internet Tendency.

SOURCE: https://bohiney.com/

The post City Council Member Proposes Making New York City The First City To Officially Recognize Noise As A Human Right appeared first on SpinTaxi Magazine.

from SpinTaxi Magazine https://ift.tt/JZoGsKD
via IFTTT